Round the Sphere Again
- Do We Even Have the Bible God Inspired?
- The Text-Critical Case Against Biblical Inspiration, Section A
- The Text-Critical Case Against Biblical Inspiration, Section B
He promises more posts in this series as well, so if you enjoyed those, you'll want to go back to check for more.
- Review of Bart Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus, by P.J Williams at Evangelical Textual Criticism, a blog you'll want to bookmark if you're interested in textual critical issues.
- Review of Bart D. Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2005) by Daniel Wallace.
You probably won't agree with them all, but that's beside the point, because they'll make you think.
It might well be that the Emergent Church has something new to offer that isn't constitutive of apostacy. But the two most obvious ways to take some of their central claims do seem to me to be ambiguous between two primary interpretive frameworks: (1) that they are saying something new that in fact distances them from central Christian teaching and (2) that they are saying something that isn't really new among evangelicals but because of their false categories they've taken to be new.
- At Jordan's View: Fundamentalism: Not Necessarily a Bad Word
- From Smart Christian: AMERICAN CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISM
- Doug at CoffeeSwirlsgives us Fundamentalism: Legal and Narrow?
Tags: Christian Carnival, Bart Ehrman, Fundamentalism, Emergent Church, Statistics
<< Home