Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be man?

It was requisite that the Mediator should be man, that he might advance our nature,[1] perform obedience to the law,[2] suffer and make intercession for us in our nature,[3] have a fellow feeling of our infirmities;[4] that we might receive the adoption of sons,[5] and have comfort and access with boldness unto the throne of grace.[6]

1. Heb. 2:16

   For surely it is not angels that he helps, but he helps the offspring of Abraham.

   
   
2. Gal. 4:4

   But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law...

   
   
3. Heb. 2:14

   Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil...

   
   Heb. 7:24-25

   ...but he holds his priesthood permanently, because he continues forever. Consequently, he is able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them.

   
   
4. Heb. 4:15

   For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

   
   
5. Gal. 4:5

   ....to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons.

   
   
6. Heb. 4:16

   Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.

   
   

Question 39, Westminster Larger Catechism.

Technorati Tags: catechism, Westminster Catechism, Westminster Standards, Jesus Christ, theology